I'll be upfront about the conflict of interest: I run LikePro. That means you should weight my opinion accordingly. What I can offer that most comparison articles can't is actual data — delivery numbers, retention rates, and support response times from real tests on real accounts, not just feature bullet points copied from both panels' marketing pages.
JustAnotherPanel is a legitimate, widely-used SMM panel. This isn't a hit piece. The goal of this comparison is to help you figure out which panel actually fits your use case, because the answer genuinely depends on what you're optimizing for.
I ran Instagram follower orders on both platforms over 90 days, tracked 7-day and 30-day retention on test accounts, and logged every support interaction. Here's what I found.
| Feature | LikePro | JustAnotherPanel (JAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers (per 1K) | $1.20 | $0.95 — cheaper |
| Start time | ~45 minutes | ~30 minutes — faster start |
| 7-day retention | 94% | 82% |
| 30-day retention | 88% | 74% |
| Refill guarantee | 30 days, always honored | Varies by service, inconsistent |
| Support response time | ~3 hours | ~8 hours |
| Drip-feed delivery | Always available | Optional on some services |
| API access | Free, no minimum | Available |
| Multi-language support | 16 languages | English primary |
There are real situations where JustAnotherPanel is the smarter option, and I want to be honest about that.
Bottom line: JAP is a solid panel for budget-first use cases where some follower drop is acceptable and you're not delivering to clients who'll notice.
The cases where LikePro's higher price justifies itself are specific — but if you fit them, the difference is significant.
This is the metric most panel comparisons skip, because it requires actually waiting 30 days and checking. Most reviewers order followers, see delivery, and call it done.
In my testing across 12 test orders split between LikePro and JAP:
The retention gap is also why the effective cost calculation isn't as simple as the per-1K price. If you pay $0.95 for 1K followers and 26% drop by day 30, your effective cost for retained followers is $0.95 ÷ 0.74 = $1.28 per retained 1K. LikePro at $1.20 with 88% retention works out to $1.20 ÷ 0.88 = $1.36 per retained 1K. The gap narrows considerably once you account for what actually stays.
And that calculation doesn't include the value of the refill guarantee — which means LikePro's effective retention is even higher once you factor in free top-ups on dropped followers within 30 days.
I contacted both panels' support teams across multiple test tickets over the 90-day testing period.
LikePro average response time: 2.8 hours. JAP average response time: 7.6 hours. Both panels resolved issues, but JAP had one ticket that took over 18 hours — not ideal when a client order is stalled.
For personal use, an 8-hour response time is perfectly acceptable. For agency use where you're accountable to clients, faster support is genuinely valuable.
The fastest way to evaluate delivery quality is to see it yourself. Create a free account, add $5, and place a small order. Compare delivery speed and retention to what you're getting now.
Create Free Account →Depends on what you're optimizing for. LikePro wins on retention (88% vs 74% at 30 days), support response time (3h vs 8h), and refill reliability. JAP wins on price ($0.95 vs $1.20/1K) and start speed. For client work and professional delivery, LikePro is the better choice. For budget personal orders where some drop is fine, JAP works.
JAP offers refill guarantees on some services, not all. Follow-through in my experience was inconsistent — some tickets resolved easily, others required significant back-and-forth. LikePro has a blanket 30-day refill policy on all follower services that's consistently applied regardless of which service you ordered from.
Yes, and it's simple. LikePro is a separate platform — sign up, add balance, and place orders. Many users run both in parallel initially to compare quality on the same accounts before committing fully. LikePro's $5 minimum makes this easy to test without risk.